Home / Finance / Australia’s Government is Shocked, Shocked by Bank Wrongdoing

Australia’s Government is Shocked, Shocked by Bank Wrongdoing

After being dragged kicking and screaming to hold an inquiry into misconduct in Australia’s financial industry, the government is now jumping aboard the bank-bashing bandwagon as public anger at evidence of wrongdoing escalates.

Among the more shocking revelations this week, the inquiry heard AMP Ltd. deliberately misled regulators over charging customers for services they didn’t receive, while Commonwealth Bank of Australia collected fees from dead people, in one case for more than a decade. AMP Chief Executive Officer Craig Meller today become the inquiry’s first scalp, saying he would step down immediately.

Treasurer Scott Morrison, who in 2016 called the Labor opposition’s push for the inquiry a “populist whinge,” on Friday decried the “very disturbing and indeed shocking revelations” as he announced tougher penalties for corporate crimes, including 10-year prison sentences.

“The punishment must always fit the crime,” Morrison told reporters in Melbourne. “And we must not forget these are not victimless crimes.”

Former deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce said his previous opposition to the inquiry was “naive” and “wrong,” and raised the prospect banks be broken up.

“I have apologized for being so naive to have swallowed their line of ‘we are good corporate citizens,”’ Joyce told Fairfax Media. “Maybe they should now as well.”

That’s quite a change of heart, but one look at the government’s poor polling shows why it’s so keen to ride the wave of public anger.

A decade ago, knowing where the oil market was going meant knowing China. Today, the same can be said for electric vehicles — which means it still applies to oil, too.

That’s a big takeaway from the latest edition of Bloomberg New Energy Finance’s annual Electric Vehicle Outlook, published on Monday. China isn’t the whole ballgame, but its role in determining the feasibility and pace of a revolution in road transportation is inescapable. Sheer size is one reason for that:

There’s more to it than just bigness. Speed counts, too. Almost 72,000 passenger electric vehicles, or EVs, were sold in China in April, up 136 percent from a year earlier, and almost four times as many as were sold in the U.S.

When BNEF released its outlook last year, I made the point that a key moment to look for was not when EV sales overtake traditional vehicles, but when EV growth begins to account for all growth in the entire market. At that point, sales of regular vehicles with internal combustion engines (ICE) will still dwarf those of the upstarts, but will have begun to decline — with big implications for investment in and further adoption of EVs. In last year’s projection, that moment occurs in 2026; in the latest forecast, 2023. That’s mostly due to China.

China’s EV market is supported by the country’s New Energy Vehicle subsidy program, which was tweaked recently to favor longer-range and more efficient models. China has good reasons to promote EV development at home, including cutting local pollution and mitigating dependence on imported oil.

Also important is the opportunity for the country to seize leadership in a new industrial field, rather than just play catch-up in old ones. As I argued here, manufactured energy plays far more to China’s strengths than the extracted kind championed by its “energy dominance”-favoring rival across the Pacific.

One of the striking aspects of China’s market already is the level of competition within it. There are almost 30 companies selling EVs in China, either alone or via joint ventures — almost double the number in the U.S., according to data compiled by BNEF. While Tesla Inc. took 26 percent of the battery EV market in the U.S. last year, it accounted for less than 4 percent of China’s.

The entire case for optimism on EVs rests on the continued decline in their cost, especially for batteries. So the rapid emergence of competition in the biggest growth market for these new vehicles is perhaps the single most important factor working in favor of EVs worldwide (see, for example, what China did for solar panels).

The flip side of this is what it means for oil. Here, again, China’s role goes beyond its mere size.

In a special supplement to this year’s EV report, BNEF also projects what the adoption of EVs, electric buses and autonomous vehicles means for road-fuel consumption. Overall, these technologies remove 7.3 million barrels a day of demand by 2040, according to BNEF’s forecasts.

Check Also

Is there an Alternative to the High Street Bank?

Can you survive without a bank? Many hard-pressed consumers may now be asking this after …